A Tubular-Mounted Digital Camera Versus Optical Surgical Microscope for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Surgery: The Impact on Operative Times, Ergonomics, and Workflow.

OBJECTIVE: Understanding ergonomic impact is foundational to critically evaluating value and safety of enabling technologies in minimally invasive spine surgeries. This study assessed the impact of a tubular-mounted digital camera (TMDC) versus an optical surgical microscope (OSM) in single-level minimally invasive spine surgeries on operative times, durotomy rate, surgeon ergonomics, safety, and operating room workflow. METHODS: This retrospective study compared consecutive single-level minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgeries in a TMDC cohort (September 2021-June 2022) with an historical OSM cohort (January 2020-July 2021). Data included patient demographics, operative times, durotomy incidence, surgeon ergonomics (Rapid Entire Body Assessment scores), and equipment impact via staff surveys. Operative times were assessed by t test, while Pearson χ2 test compared sex. Age, body mass index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index comparisons were made by Wilcoxon rank sum tests, and survey results were analyzed with Wilcoxon signed rank tests. RESULTS: TMDC and OSM groups included 74 and 82 patients, respectively. Age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index did not significantly differ between groups. The TMDC group had a higher body mass index (29.6 ± 5.1) than the OSM group (29.0 ± 7.5) (P = 0.04). The TMDC group had significantly shorter operative times (57.3 ± 16.6 minutes) than the OSM group) (66.7 ± 22.5 minutes) (P = 0.004), with no difference in durotomy rates (P = 0.42). TMDC use yielded lower Rapid Entire Body Assessment scores compared with OSM (4.1 ± 0.77) (P < 0.001). Surveys indicated improved safety, setup time, and workflow with TMDC (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TMDC in single-level minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery improved surgeon ergonomics, reduced operative times, and maintained durotomy rates, enhancing operating room efficiency. Evaluating ergonomic impact of technology is vital for safety and value assessment.

Successful Implantation of a Ventricular Shunt With Termination in the Iliac Bone in the Adult Patient With Obstructive Hydrocephalus.

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: With the exception of the 3 classic shunt placement options (ventriculoperitoneal, ventriculopleural, and ventriculoatrial), surgically feasible alternative sites for distal catheter placement remain limited and often require the assistance of an access surgeon. Tubbs et al suggested the possibility of intraosseous cerebrospinal fluid diversion in the ilium, noting that ilium infusion in cadaveric specimens was possible without the development of body edema or fluid overflow. Since this publication, limited case reports have been published on the success of ventriculo-ilium (VI) shunt placement. Here, we describe the technique used for successful VI shunt placement in 2 adult patients. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: Here, we describe 2 patients with differing etiologies of hydrocephalus (obstructive and nonobstructive) and complex medical and surgical problems precluding traditional distal shunt termini. Both patients underwent successful placement of a VI shunt with distal catheter placement into the right iliac crest using a small right-angle connector and small cranial fixation plate to prevent backout of the catheter. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: We report the first demonstration of successful placement of a VI shunt in 2 adult patients with evidence of shunt functionality and improved neurological outcome. We propose that the placement of a VI shunt is an easy and viable option when more traditional shunt methods are not available for use.